Question 1

Where does DEEPPLANE™ source its surgeon data?

Accepted Answer

We compile profiles from Google Business listings, professional-society directories (ISAPS, AAFPRS, BAAPS, EBOPRAS), clinic websites, Instagram portfolios, published peer-reviewed literature and direct surgeon submissions. Most profiles — 1,541 of 1,572 — were compiled from public sources without contacting the surgeon first. We do not yet record provenance per field: our provenance table holds 6 records at the time of writing. Unless a page says otherwise, treat a profile field as the surgeon's or clinic's own published material rather than something we confirmed.

Question 2

How does DEEPPLANE™ verify surgeon credentials?

Accepted Answer

A DEEPPLANE™-verified badge means one thing: the surgeon claimed their profile and we confirmed they control the practice email domain. We do not check government ID, query medical-board registers, authenticate photos, or monitor licence/disciplinary status. Board certifications are self-reported by the surgeon or clinic. No surgeon is excluded from the directory for failing a check — there is no check to fail.

Question 3

Does DEEPPLANE™ use AI-generated content?

Accepted Answer

Yes, and on profile fields too. We use AI to draft educational content, surgeon biographies and translations, and also to produce the structured board-certification records, surgical-philosophy and FAQ blocks that appear on surgeon pages — these are model-generated from public sources such as clinic websites and search results, and carry a lower confidence than a primary record. Names, locations, contact details, Google ratings and photo counts are not model-generated. On learn pages we use hedged, evidence-based language and cite peer-reviewed sources wherever a clinical claim is made. We previously said no surgeon profile field was AI-generated; that was wrong, and this answer replaces it.

Question 4

How often is surgeon and content information updated?

Accepted Answer

Google review data is refreshed on an automated schedule, and directory counts are a live query run on every page load. We do not currently run quarterly re-verification: 364 profiles carry a last-verified date, 349 of them from a single sweep on 2026-04-30, and 15 in the last 90 days. Learn pages display their last-modified date. There is no fixed editorial review cycle, and we would rather say so than publish a cadence we do not keep.

Question 5

Can a surgeon pay to improve their ranking on DEEPPLANE™?

Accepted Answer

A surgeon cannot buy a ranking position, and wallet activity — debited per inquiry-unlock — does not affect placement. But the ordering is simpler than we used to describe: listings are sorted by verification tier first, then by subscription start date, then alphabetically by surname. Review volume, Google rating and our authority score are displayed on profiles but do not enter the sort. One disclosure that matters: from 2026-09-01, keeping a verified tier requires a live DEEPPLANE™ badge on the surgeon's own website, so the first sort key is partly a function of linking to us. We would rather state that than call the ranking purely objective.

Question 6

Can I cite DEEPPLANE™ data in an academic paper or clinical review?

Accepted Answer

Yes — all DEEPPLANE™ bulk datasets at /api/v1/*.json are published under CC-BY-4.0, which permits reuse in academic work with attribution. The datasets cover deep plane facelift cost by country, procedure facts, recovery timeline, medical glossary, question & answer catalog, and ClaimReview fact-checks. Preferred citation: DEEPPLANE™. 2026 Deep Plane Facelift Data Catalog. Available at https://deepplane.com/api/v1/index.json (accessed YYYY-MM-DD). An AMA-style citation variant is shown in the For Researchers & Journalists section below. For a methodology deep-dive or custom dataset slice, email research@deepplane.com.

Question 7

How do I request a custom dataset or methodology clarification?

Accepted Answer

Researchers, journalists, and standards bodies can email research@deepplane.com with a one-paragraph description of the intended use (paper topic, outlet, deadline). We respond within 3 business days. Typical requests we support: de-identified aggregate surgeon-volume statistics by country, time-series of cost ranges, before/after outcome-grading distributions, and access to internal methodology documents. We do not share personal patient data or individual surgeon financial records under any circumstances.

Question 8

Who writes DEEPPLANE™'s educational content and what are their qualifications?

Accepted Answer

Every learn-page article on DEEPPLANE™ has a named medical reviewer whose credentials are disclosed at the top of the article and in machine-readable Person schema on the page. Our current medical review panel includes board-certified plastic surgeons with active practices in deep plane facelift surgery (membership: ISAPS, AAFPRS, ABPS, EBOPRAS), and at least one reviewer is listed per article. Drafts are produced in-house with AI assistance and edited by the founder; we do not employ medical writers and none of our writers have worked at a peer-reviewed journal. A separately recorded per-page review signature is rarer than the byline suggests — the live count is in the table on our methodology page. Every other page names our medical reviewer as reviewer-of-record for the site's editorial standard, not as a per-page sign-off. AI assists with drafting and research synthesis; the reviewer's approval is the publication gate.

Question 9

How does DEEPPLANE™ handle conflicts of interest and advertiser influence?

Accepted Answer

We take no advertising, no sponsored listings, and no paid editorial placements — revenue comes only from per-inquiry unlock fees, which do not influence ranking or editorial coverage. Every team member discloses any equity, consulting, or advisory role with a surgeon or clinic; overlaps trigger recusal. There is no editorial ombudsperson or annual external review. Our medical reviewer is also a listed surgeon — a conflict we disclose.

Question 10

How do you fairly compare outcomes across surgeons who treat different kinds of cases?

Accepted Answer

We don't — and we don't publish outcome data at all, because we hold none. There is no photo-grading rubric, no clinical review panel, no complication-rate dataset and no review-weighting policy; those were described here before they existed. What we show is what a surgeon or clinic published plus a Google rating where one exists, and we say which is which. Comparing surgeons on outcomes is the thing a patient most needs and the thing we cannot yet give them; collecting consented outcome data is on our roadmap, not on this page.

Question 11

How does DEEPPLANE™ handle disputes from surgeons about their profile data?

Accepted Answer

Any surgeon can dispute any field on their profile by emailing hello@deepplane.com with the page URL and what is wrong. We read every one and correct or remove what we cannot support. What we do not have: a triage SLA, a second reviewer, an on-profile disputed-item notice, and an ombudsperson — those were described here before they existed and the description has been removed. We do not take factually accurate material down under commercial pressure, and what a surgeon spends has no bearing on the outcome.

Question 12

Under what circumstances is a surgeon delisted from DEEPPLANE™?

Accepted Answer

Surgeons are permanently delisted for any of seven reasons: loss of board certification or license, a substantiated disciplinary action, forged credentials or falsified photos, a pattern of three or more substantiated complaints in 12 months, attempts to buy editorial or ranking influence, evidence of patient coercion or ghost surgery, or the surgeon's own request. The founder decides; there's no ombudsperson review or public delisting-notice page.

What	How many	How it got there
Surgeons listed	1,411	Across 70 countries. 1,377 were compiled from public sources without us contacting the surgeon; 486 of those came from scraping rather than a directory listing or a submission.
DEEPPLANE™-verified	35	Means one specific thing: the surgeon claimed the profile and we confirmed they control the practice email domain. It is not a check of the surgeon.
Board certification listed	1,010	Self-reported — taken from the surgeon's or clinic's own published text, an NPI taxonomy code, or a model reading a search result. We do not query the issuing board.
Credentials confirmed with the issuing body	0	Our published credential registry reports this figure itself. It has always been zero.
Profiles with a documented case volume	0	We hold no case-volume data for any surgeon. Ask for it directly in your consultation.
Facility accreditation on file	—	No such field exists in our data. Where a page names JCI or an equivalent, it is describing the hospital, not something we verified.
Per-field source records	9	The provenance engine — source URL, capture time, content hash per field — is in development. 9 records exist platform-wide, so treat a profile field as the surgeon's own published material unless a page says otherwise.
Before / after images published	2,543	Collected from public clinic websites, Instagram and YouTube. 54 carry a signed patient consent on file. We do not authenticate images, and no image here has been checked against a surgeon's records.
Profiles showing a fee	21	Of 1,411 listed profiles. 10 carry a fee the surgeon published himself; the rest of the figures we hold are bands this platform generated, and we do not show those beside a named doctor. Where a profile is blank, we could not establish a fee — it is not a claim that the surgeon is expensive or cheap.
Patient reviews collected by us	0	Star ratings on profiles come from Google, are shown with their source, and are not verified as coming from patients — by Google or by us.
Educational pages with a recorded medical review	1 of 164	Pages are written and edited in-house and read by Dr. Yakup Duman, Specialist in Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. There is no standing review panel; per-page review status is published as it is recorded.
Newsletter subscribers	12	Listed because it was published as “10,000+” until 2026-08-01, and a corrections page that skips its own embarrassing number is not a corrections page.

Our methodology.

What we check — and what we don’t

How We Collect Surgeon Data

What Actually Happens To A Profile

1 · Compiled

2 · Claimed

3 · Badged

4 · Corrected

Content Generation

Data Freshness

Editorial Independence

The Patient-Ordered Verification Dossier

Canonical Data Facts — Source provenance

Source tier preference

Verification ladder

Public auditable surface

DMCA Safe Harbor

For Researchers & Journalists

Frequently Asked Questions

Medical References

Continue Your Research

Explore Further