Deep Plane vs AuraLyft: Deep plane facelift releases ligaments for comprehensive tissue repositioning, while AuraLyft is a branded SMAS technique with vertical lifting. Deep plane typically provides longer-lasting results (10-15 vs 7-10 years).
— DeepPlane.com Medical Team
Deep Plane vs Auralyft: Quick Facts
- Deep Plane
- Full SMAS release
- Auralyft
- Minimally invasive
- Longevity
- Deep plane longer lasting
- Recovery
- Auralyft faster
- Results
- Deep plane more dramatic
- Cost
- Auralyft typically lower
Source: Medical Literature & Expert Consensus
Deep Plane vs Auralyft
Quick Answer
What is the difference between deep plane facelift and Auralyft?
Deep plane facelift is a comprehensive surgical technique that repositions deep facial structures for 10-15 year results. Auralyft is a branded, less invasive facelift technique that uses smaller incisions and local anesthesia, with results lasting 5-7 years.
Source: DeepPlane.com
Why You Should Know This
A deep plane facelift provides a more comprehensive lift with results lasting 10-15 years, while the Auralyft is a less invasive, branded technique with 5-7 year longevity. The deep plane repositions deeper tissues for a more natural outcome, making it a more durable solution for facial rejuvenation. Understanding these key distinctions is the first step toward choosing the right procedure.
- •AuraLyft uses SMAS plication without full ligament release
- •Deep plane provides more comprehensive tissue repositioning
- •Result longevity differs significantly between the two approaches
The AuraLyft is a marketing term for a variation of the deep plane facelift performed under local anesthesia with shorter recovery. While both techniques work beneath the SMAS layer, a traditional deep plane facelift under general anesthesia allows the surgeon more time for precise dissection and typically addresses more comprehensive aging. Results from both approaches can last 10-15 years when performed by experienced surgeons.
Comparing traditional deep plane facelift with the Auralyft technique to help you understand which approach may be best for your facial rejuvenation goals. To determine which procedure suits you, read our candidate guide.
AuraLyft vs Traditional Deep Plane
AuraLyft
Traditional Deep Plane
Result Longevity Timeline
How long each technique's results typically last over time.
Gradual after year 10
Noticeable after year 5
Fading by year 5
Dissolving by year 2
What is Auralyft?
Auralyft is a proprietary facelift technique developed by Dr. Ben Talei at the Beverly Hills Center for Plastic & Laser Surgery. It combines elements of deep plane dissection with a less invasive approach, designed to provide natural-looking results with reduced downtime.
The technique is performed under local anesthesia with sedation, rather than general anesthesia, which appeals to patients who want to avoid the risks associated with being fully unconscious during surgery.
Auralyft focuses on the lower face and jawline, using smaller incisions than traditional deep plane facelift. While it incorporates some deep plane principles, it is generally considered less comprehensive than a full deep plane procedure.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Auralyft | Deep Plane Facelift |
|---|---|---|
| Technique | Modified deep plane with smaller dissection | Full deep plane release of facial ligaments |
| Target Areas | Lower face, jowls, jawline | Full face, midface, jowls, neck |
| Anesthesia | Local with sedation | General anesthesia |
| Surgery Duration | 2-3 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Recovery Time | 7-10 days | 2-3 weeks |
| Results Duration | 5-7 years | 10-15 years |
| Cost Range | $20,000 - $35,000 | $15,000 - $50,000 |
| Availability | Limited (proprietary technique) | Widely available |
| Scar Visibility | Hidden around ears and hairline | Minimal, short incision |
| Ideal Age Range | 50-70 years | 40-55 years |
| Midface Lifting | Comprehensive | Limited |
| Patient Satisfaction | 94.4% | ~85% |
Questions & Answers
Medical References
- [1]Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53-61(Journal Article)Accessed: 2026-03-21
- [2]Barrera A. Refinements in the deep-plane facelift technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):290-301(Journal Article)Accessed: 2026-03-21
- [3]
Key Facts
Common Misconceptions
Myth: AuraLyft is a type of deep plane
Fact: AuraLyft is a SMAS-based technique, not deep plane. It does not involve the same ligament release.
Myth: AuraLyft provides identical results
Fact: While AuraLyft can provide good results, deep plane typically offers longer longevity and better midface improvement.
Myth: AuraLyft is newer and therefore better
Fact: Newer does not mean better. Deep plane has 30+ years of proven results and remains the gold standard.
Compare All Facelift Techniques
Medically Reviewed
Dr. Yakup Duman
Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery Specialist
Board-certified Plastic & Aesthetic Surgery specialist with 20+ years of experience. Specializes in deep plane facelift at Merkez Prime Hospital, Istanbul. Medical Reviewer for DeepPlane.com.
Compare Other Techniques:
Stay informed about deep plane facelift
Join 12,000+ readers — monthly research updates, surgeon spotlights, and patient guides. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.