Deep Plane vs AuraLyft: Deep plane facelift releases ligaments for comprehensive tissue repositioning, while AuraLyft is a branded SMAS technique with vertical lifting. Deep plane typically provides longer-lasting results (10-15 vs 7-10 years).
— DeepPlane.com Medical Advisory Board
Deep Plane vs Auralyft: Quick Facts
- Deep Plane
- Full SMAS release
- Auralyft
- Minimally invasive
- Longevity
- Deep plane longer lasting
- Recovery
- Auralyft faster
- Results
- Deep plane more dramatic
- Cost
- Auralyft typically lower
Source: Clinical Studies & The Aesthetic Society
Deep Plane vs Auralyft
Why This Topic Matters
A deep plane facelift provides a more comprehensive lift with results lasting 10-15 years, while the Auralyft is a less invasive, branded technique with 5-7 year longevity. The deep plane repositions deeper tissues for a more natural outcome, making it a more durable solution for facial rejuvenation. Understanding these key distinctions is the first step toward choosing the right procedure.
- •AuraLyft uses SMAS plication without full ligament release
- •Deep plane provides more comprehensive tissue repositioning
- •Result longevity differs significantly between the two approaches
Comparing traditional deep plane facelift with the Auralyft technique to help you understand which approach may be best for your facial rejuvenation goals.
What is Auralyft?
Auralyft is a proprietary facelift technique developed by Dr. Ben Talei at the Beverly Hills Center for Plastic & Laser Surgery. It combines elements of deep plane dissection with a less invasive approach, designed to provide natural-looking results with reduced downtime.
The technique is performed under local anesthesia with sedation, rather than general anesthesia, which appeals to patients who want to avoid the risks associated with being fully unconscious during surgery.
Auralyft focuses on the lower face and jawline, using smaller incisions than traditional deep plane facelift. While it incorporates some deep plane principles, it is generally considered less comprehensive than a full deep plane procedure.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Auralyft | Deep Plane Facelift |
|---|---|---|
| Technique | Modified deep plane with smaller dissection | Full deep plane release of facial ligaments |
| Target Areas | Lower face, jowls, jawline | Full face, midface, jowls, neck |
| Anesthesia | Local with sedation | General anesthesia |
| Surgery Duration | 2-3 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Recovery Time | 7-10 days | 2-3 weeks |
| Results Duration | 5-7 years | 10-15 years |
| Cost Range | $20,000 - $35,000 | $15,000 - $50,000 |
| Availability | Limited (proprietary technique) | Widely available |
| Scar Visibility | Hidden around ears and hairline | Minimal, short incision |
| Ideal Age Range | 50-70 years | 40-55 years |
| Midface Lifting | Comprehensive | Limited |
| Patient Satisfaction | 94.4% | ~85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between deep plane facelift and Auralyft?
Deep plane facelift is a comprehensive surgical technique that repositions deep facial structures for 10-15 year results. Auralyft is a branded, less invasive facelift technique that uses smaller incisions and local anesthesia, with results lasting 5-7 years.
Is Auralyft as effective as deep plane facelift?
Auralyft can produce excellent results for appropriate candidates with mild to moderate aging. However, for patients with significant midface descent or severe neck laxity, a full deep plane facelift typically provides more comprehensive and longer-lasting results.
Who performs Auralyft?
Auralyft is a proprietary technique primarily performed by Dr. Ben Talei and surgeons he has trained. In contrast, deep plane facelift is a widely taught technique available from many board-certified plastic surgeons worldwide.
