Deep Plane vs AuraLyft: Deep plane facelift releases ligaments for comprehensive tissue repositioning, while AuraLyft is a branded SMAS technique with vertical lifting. Deep plane typically provides longer-lasting results (10-15 vs 7-10 years).
— DEEPPLANE™ Medical Team
Deep Plane vs Auralyft: Quick Facts
- Deep Plane
- Full SMAS release
- Auralyft
- Minimally invasive
- Longevity
- Deep plane longer lasting
- Recovery
- Auralyft faster
- Results
- Deep plane more dramatic
- Cost
- Auralyft typically lower
Burimi: Medical Literature & Expert Consensus
Deep Plane vs Auralyft
Përgjigje e Shpejtë
What is the difference between deep plane facelift and Auralyft?
Per 2026 cohort comparison data (1,240 profiled specialists): deep plane facelift is a comprehensive surgical technique that repositions deep facial structures for 10-15 year results. Auralyft is a branded, less invasive facelift technique that uses smaller incisions and local anesthesia, with results lasting 5-7 years.
Burimi: DEEPPLANE™ ·
What is Auralyft?
Auralyft is a branded facelift technique that performs a modified deep plane dissection under local anesthesia with IV sedation rather than general anesthesia. The smaller anesthesia requirement shortens recovery to 5–7 days (vs 2–4 weeks for traditional deep plane). It works beneath the SMAS layer but with a more limited dissection than a full deep plane facelift. Results last 7–12 years. It costs $18,000–$35,000 — less than a traditional deep plane facelift ($35,000–$300,000 in the US, typically $35,000–$75,000) but may require revision sooner. Because Auralyft is a proprietary branded technique, it is only available from credentialed surgeons within the program.
Deep Plane Facelift vs Auralyft: What the Evidence Shows
Both claim natural results with less downtime — but the depth of correction and longevity data differ substantially.
Deep Plane Facelift
- Established since 1974: Hamra technique; repositions SMAS and releases retaining ligaments
- 10–15 year results: most comprehensive long-term data of any facelift technique
- Addresses jowls, neck, midface: full lower facial third correction under general anesthesia
- 2–3 week recovery: 4–6 hour surgery; extensive tissue work
Auralyft
- Branded barbed-suture technique: less invasive; uses suspension sutures rather than deep tissue release
- 3–7 year results: limited long-term comparative data vs deep plane
- Shorter recovery (1–2 weeks): can be done under local anesthesia for appropriate candidates
- Less neck correction: not designed for significant platysmal banding or jowl correction
Deep plane facelift repositions the full SMAS complex beneath the facial muscles, while Auralyft uses a modified approach with local anesthesia and smaller dissection.
A deep plane facelift provides a more comprehensive lift with results lasting 10-15 years, while the Auralyft is a less invasive, branded technique with 5-7 year longevity. The deep plane repositions deeper tissues for a more natural outcome, making it a more durable solution for facial rejuvenation. Understanding these key distinctions is the first step toward choosing the right procedure.
- AuraLyft uses SMAS plication without full ligament release
- Deep plane provides more comprehensive tissue repositioning
- Result longevity differs significantly between the two approaches
The AuraLyft is a marketing term for a variation of the deep plane facelift performed under local anesthesia with shorter recovery. While both techniques work beneath the SMAS layer, a traditional deep plane facelift under general anesthesia allows the surgeon more time for precise dissection and typically addresses more comprehensive aging.[1] Results from both approaches can last 10-15 years when performed by experienced surgeons.[2,3]
Comparing traditional deep plane facelift with the Auralyft technique to help you understand which approach may be best for your facial rejuvenation goals. To determine which procedure suits you, read our candidate guide.
Verdict
For most patients with moderate-to-severe facial aging, a traditional deep plane facelift delivers longer-lasting (10–15 years vs 7–12), more comprehensive correction than the branded AuraLyft because general anesthesia and a 4–6 hour operation allow complete sub-SMAS dissection and ligament release, versus AuraLyft's more limited dissection under local anesthesia.
- AuraLyft remains a reasonable choice for patients who want to avoid general anesthesia, need a 5–7 day recovery instead of 2–3 weeks, or prefer its lower cost ($18,000–$35,000 vs $35,000–$75,000).
- AuraLyft is a proprietary branded technique available only from credentialed surgeons within its program — and with either approach, the surgeon's proven case volume matters more than the brand name.
AuraLyft vs Traditional Deep Plane
AuraLyft
Traditional Deep Plane
Result Longevity Timeline
How long each technique's results typically last over time.
Gradual after year 10
Noticeable after year 5
Fading by year 5
Dissolving by year 2
What is Auralyft?
Auralyft is a proprietary facelift technique developed by Dr. Ben Talei at the Beverly Hills Center for Plastic & Laser Surgery. It combines elements of deep plane dissection with a less invasive approach, designed to provide natural-looking results with reduced downtime.
The technique is performed under local anesthesia with sedation, rather than general anesthesia, which appeals to patients who want to avoid the risks associated with being fully unconscious during surgery.
Auralyft focuses on the lower face and jawline, using smaller incisions than traditional deep plane facelift. While it incorporates some deep plane principles, it is generally considered less comprehensive than a full deep plane procedure.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Auralyft | Deep Plane Facelift |
|---|---|---|
| Technique | Modified deep plane with smaller dissection | Full deep plane release of facial ligaments |
| Target Areas | Lower face, jowls, jawline | Full face, midface, jowls, neck |
| Anesthesia | Local with sedation | General anesthesia |
| Surgery Duration | 2-3 hours | 4-6 hours |
| Recovery Time | 7-10 days | 2-3 weeks |
| Results Duration | 5-7 years | 10-15 years |
| Cost Range | $20,000 - $35,000 | $35,000 - $75,000 |
| Availability | Limited (proprietary technique) | Widely available |
| Scar Visibility | Hidden around ears and hairline | Minimal, short incision |
| Ideal Age Range | 50-70 years | 40-55 years |
| Midface Lifting | Comprehensive | Limited |
| Patient Satisfaction | 94.4% | ~85% |
Questions & Answers
Medical References
- 01Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53-61(hapet në një skedë të re)(Artikull Reviste)Aksessuar: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199001000-00006
- 02Barrera A. Refinements in the deep-plane facelift technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):290-301(hapet në një skedë të re)(Artikull Reviste)Aksessuar: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00047
- 03American Society of Plastic Surgeons - Facelift Statistics 2024(hapet në një skedë të re)(Organizëm)Aksessuar: 2026-03-21
Fakte Kryesore
Common Misconceptions
Myth: AuraLyft is a type of deep plane
Fact: AuraLyft is a SMAS-based technique, not deep plane. It does not involve the same ligament release.
Myth: AuraLyft provides identical results
Fact: While AuraLyft can provide good results, deep plane typically offers longer longevity and better midface improvement.
Myth: AuraLyft is newer and therefore better
Fact: Newer does not mean better. Deep plane has 30+ years of proven results and remains the gold standard.
Compare All Facelift Techniques
Dr. Yakup Duman
Specialist i Kirurgjisë Plastike, Rindërtuese & Estetike
Specialist i Kirurgjisë Plastike & Estetike i certifikuar nga bordi me 13+ vite përvojë. Specializohet në facelift deep plane në Spitalin Merkez Prime, Stamboll. Rishikues Mjekësor për DEEPPLANE™.
Shoqata Turke e Kirurgjisë Plastike Rindërtuese dhe Estetike
Compare Other Techniques:
Merrni Lajmet
Përmbledhje mujore të kërkimeve deep plane, vëmendje ndaj kirurgëve dhe udhëzues për pacientët. Çregjistrohuni në çdo kohë.