DEEPPLANE
AnmeldenPanel
Beratung anfordern

Deep Plane Facelift Research Library

This library is a reading list of the peer-reviewed sources DEEPPLANE™ cites on the deep plane facelift, grouped by anatomy, technique, safety, outcomes and comparisons, with a journal or PubMed link where one exists. It does not grade papers or surgeons, and none of the studies is ours: we hold no study of our own, so every rate on this site comes from the sources listed here. What DEEPPLANE™ holds as data: 6.417 published before-and-after pairs from 905 surgeons in 59 countries, 31 of them photographed twelve months or more after surgery.

Beratung anfordern

64 peer-reviewed sources — anatomy, technique, safety, outcomes, and comparisons. 40 citations include a DOI for direct journal access.

A DEEPPLANE™-verified profile means the DEEPPLANE™ badge is live on the surgeon’s own website (or a dated reprieve stands in for it) and the profile is verified as the surgeon’s: they claimed it and we approved the claim on proof of control, such as a code sent to the practice email on file or our link on the surgeon’s own site, or, for an unclaimed profile, DEEPPLANE™ verified it on evidence that ties that website to the surgeon or on public signals such as Google reviews. It is not a check of board certification, licence status, photographs or identity. Was wir prüfen und was nicht.

Request a Consultation

Free · No obligation

64
Total Citations
42
Journal Articles
40
With DOI
12
Research Areas

Citation Standards

All sources follow MEDRS (Medicine and Science Reliable Source) standards: peer-reviewed journals indexed in PubMed, with systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials weighted above case reports. Institutional statistics from ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS are accepted for prevalence data. Sources are reviewed annually for retraction or supersession.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many peer-reviewed studies support deep plane facelift?
DEEPPLANE™ cites 42 peer-reviewed journal articles and clinical studies across anatomy, technique, safety, and outcomes — all with PubMed or DOI links for independent verification.
What is the strongest evidence that deep plane facelift lasts longer?
Jacono & Rousso (2012) conducted a randomised controlled trial comparing deep plane versus SMAS plication in the same patient (one side each) and found significantly greater longevity and soft-tissue mobilisation on the deep plane side. A 2020 systematic review confirmed the finding across multiple studies.
What DOI links are available for deep plane research?
40 of the citations on this page include a direct DOI link, allowing clinicians and researchers to retrieve the full text via DOI.org or institutional library access.
Who first described the deep plane facelift technique?
Sam T. Hamra, MD, introduced the deep plane rhytidectomy in 1990 (Plast Reconstr Surg. 86(1):53-61). The technique elevated the dissection plane below the SMAS and orbicularis oculi, enabling more natural and durable results than surface-plane methods.
What is the complication rate for deep plane facelift?
Large cohort studies report hematoma rates of 1–3%, permanent facial nerve injury below 0.5%, and infection rates below 1%. Temporary nerve weakness affects up to 2.6% of patients but resolves in the majority within three months.
Is there evidence for combining deep plane facelift with other procedures?
Yes. Multiple studies show simultaneous fat grafting, blepharoplasty, and neck lift can be performed safely in a single anaesthetic episode, with meta-analyses confirming no significant increase in complication rates when performed by experienced surgeons.
Are the same techniques used for men as for women?
No. Technique modifications for men include beard-pattern skin management, different hairline-preserving incisions, and attention to sideburn position. Sykes & colleagues have published the most-cited guidance on gender-specific approach adjustments.
How does DEEPPLANE™ evaluate the quality of citations?
We apply MEDRS (Medicine and Science in Wikipedia Reliable Sources) standards: peer-reviewed journals indexed in PubMed, systematic reviews and RCTs weighted above case reports, institutional statistics from ASPS/ISAPS accepted for prevalence data, and all sources reviewed annually for retraction or supersession.

How many peer-reviewed studies support deep plane facelift?

DEEPPLANE™ cites 42 peer-reviewed journal articles and clinical studies on deep plane facelift technique, anatomy, outcomes, and safety — all with PubMed or DOI links for independent verification. Foundational evidence includes the 2012 Jacono & Rousso RCT (same-patient bilateral comparison), a 2020 systematic review confirming greater longevity, and ASPS/ISAPS prevalence data updated annually. (DEEPPLANE™ Research Library, 2026.)

Deep Plane Facelift Research: What the Evidence Actually Shows

The evidence base is strong for longevity — with acknowledged limits in long-term comparative data.

Strongest Clinical Evidence

  • Jacono & Rousso 2012 RCT: same-patient bilateral comparison; most rigorous deep plane vs SMAS study
  • 2020 systematic review: deep plane outlasts MACS and superficial techniques; confirmed across 8 studies
  • Longevity, in part: the one long-term deep plane series counts only patients who returned for a second facelift (10.9 years on average; Levin & Frankel 2026, PMID 41749415)

Where Research Shows Limits

  • Long-term 20+ year data sparse: most follow-up studies are short
  • Technique variation complicates comparisons: surgeon variability in 'deep plane' definition affects outcome data
  • Cost-effectiveness data limited: few studies include economic analysis or quality-of-life outcomes
Anatomical cross-section comparing the SMAS facelift dissection plane with the deeper deep plane facelift dissection plane.

Citations by Research Area

Horizontal timeline of facelift technique evolution from the 1960s subcutaneous facelift through the 1970s SMAS introduction to the modern deep plane facelift.

Deep Plane Facelift Technique

10 sources

Foundational and current evidence on deep plane rhytidectomy outcomes and technique.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53-61(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199007000-00008
  2. 02
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons - Facelift Statistics 2024(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  3. 03
    Jacono AA, Bryant LM. Extended Deep Plane Facelift: Incorporating Facial Retaining Ligament Release and Composite Flap Shifts to Maximize Midface, Jawline and Neck Rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(4):527-554(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.06.007
  4. 04
    International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) Global Survey 2023(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  5. 05
    Khoury S, Almubarak Z, Khan H, Boldt G, Villemure-Poliquin N, Nichols AC. The Deep Plane versus SMAS Facelift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(21):5895-5903(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s00266-025-05118-x
  6. 06
    Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(1):1-13(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199207000-00001
  7. 07
    National Library of Medicine (NIH) - Rhytidectomy (Facelift) StatPearls(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Regierungsquelle)Zugriff: 2026-03-25
  8. 08
    American Board of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ABFPRS) - Board Certification Standards(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-25
  9. 09
    FDA - Cosmetic Surgery Safety Information(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Regierungsquelle)Zugriff: 2026-04-06
  10. 10
    AAFPRS - The Rise of the Deep Plane Facelift and Why Credentials Count(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-07-24
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Anatomy & Mechanism

6 sources

Peer-reviewed anatomy studies on SMAS, retaining ligaments, and facial compartments.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Mendelson BC, et al. Surgical anatomy of the midcheek and malar mounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):885-896(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200209010-00026
  2. 02
    Stuzin JM. Restoring facial shape in face lifting: the role of skeletal support in facial analysis and midface soft-tissue repositioning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(1):362-376(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000251092.82860.25
  3. 03
    Yang SH, Park H, Yoo DS, Joo W, Rhoton A. Microsurgical anatomy of the facial nerve. Clin Anat. 2021;34(1):90-102(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1002/ca.23652
  4. 04
    Furnas DW. The retaining ligaments of the cheek. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(1):11-16(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198901000-00003
  5. 05
    Jacono AA, Bryant LM, Ahmedli NN. A Novel Extended Deep Plane Facelift Technique for Jawline Rejuvenation and Volumization. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1265-1281(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy292
  6. 06
    Mitz V, Peyronie M. The superficial musculo-aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58(1):80-88(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-10-07DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197607000-00013
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Technique Comparisons

5 sources

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews comparing facelift approaches.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Owsley JQ. Face lifting: problems, solutions, and an outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):302-313(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05
  2. 02
    Marten TJ. High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35(4):569-603(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2008.04.002
  3. 03
    Swanson E. Outcome analysis in 93 facial rejuvenation patients treated with a deep-plane face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(2):823-834(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed81f
  4. 04
    Tonnard P, et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(6):2074-2086(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200205000-00046
  5. 05
    Baker D. Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face lift) with lateral SMASectomy. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21(1):68-79(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1067/maj.2001.113529
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Recovery & Outcomes

5 sources

Clinical data on healing timelines, swelling resolution, and patient-reported outcomes.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 1983;10(3):543-562(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31873-3
  2. 02
    Mottura AA. Face lift postoperative recovery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(3):172-180(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s00266-001-0029-3
  3. 03
    American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Recovery Guidelines(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  4. 04
    Mayo Clinic - Facelift: What you can expect(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  5. 05
    Cleveland Clinic - Rhytidectomy (Facelift): Recovery and Outlook(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Safety & Complications

6 sources

Large-cohort safety studies, nerve injury rates, and hematoma incidence data.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Baker DC. Complications of cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg. 1983;10(3):543-562(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/S0094-1298(20)31873-3
  2. 02
    Khoury S, Almubarak Z, Khan H, Boldt G, Villemure-Poliquin N, Nichols AC. The Deep Plane versus SMAS Facelift: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025;49(21):5895-5903(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s00266-025-05118-x
  3. 03
    Cason RW, Avashia YJ, Shammas RL, Savetsky IL, Rohrich RJ. Perioperative Approach to Reducing Hematoma during Rhytidectomy: What Does the Evidence Show? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(6):1297-1309(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007943
  4. 04
    Cristel RT, Irvine LE. Common Complications in Rhytidectomy. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2019;27(4):519-527(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2019.07.008
  5. 05
    Mottura AA. Face lift postoperative recovery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(3):172-180(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1007/s00266-001-0029-3
  6. 06
    Winocour J, Gupta V, Kaoutzanis C, Shi H, Shack RB, Grotting JC, Higdon KK. Venous Thromboembolism in the Cosmetic Patient: Analysis of 129,007 Patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;37(3):337-349(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjw173
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Facial Aging Science

5 sources

Volumetric, structural, and gravitational models of facial aging.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Guyuron B, et al. Factors contributing to the facial aging of identical twins. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(4):1321-1331(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819c4d42
  2. 02
    Coleman SR, Grover R. The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26(1S):S4-S9(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2005.09.012
  3. 03
    Lambros V. Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(5):1367-1376(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279348.09156.c3
  4. 04
    Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(7):2219-2227(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-03-21DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000265403.66886.54
  5. 05
    Ramanadham SR, Rohrich RJ. Newer Understanding of Specific Anatomic Targets in the Aging Face as Applied to Injectables: Superficial and Deep Facial Fat Compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(5 Suppl):49S-55S(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001730
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Combined Procedures

4 sources

Evidence for simultaneous rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, fat grafting, and neck lifts.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Carraway JH, Mellow CG. The prevention and treatment of lower lid ectropion following blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85(6):971-981(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199006000-00025
  2. 02
    Pitanguy I, Ceravolo MP. Our experience with combined procedures in aesthetic plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(1):56-65(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198301000-00013
  3. 03
    Achauer BM, Adair SR, VanderKam VM. Combined rhytidectomy and full-face laser resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106(7):1608-1611(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200012000-00027
  4. 04
    Gentile P, Garcovich S. Systematic Review: Platelet-Rich Plasma Use in Facial Rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(1):72e-82e(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Forschungsstudie)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010150
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Complications Management

5 sources

Nerve palsy, hematoma, scarring, and infection — evidence-based management.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Fang AH, de la Torre J. A Systematic Review of Rhytidectomy Complications and Prevention Methods: Evaluating the Trends. Ann Plast Surg. 2025;94(6S Suppl 4):S502-S516(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004272
  2. 02
    Webster RC, Kazda G, Hamdan US, Fuleihan NS, Smith RC. Cigarette smoking and face lift: conservative versus wide undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;77(4):596-604(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198604000-00014
  3. 03
    Niamtu J 3rd. Expanding hematoma in face-lift surgery: literature review, case presentations, and caveats. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 1):1134-1144(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05
  4. 04
    Eremia S, Umar SH, Li CY. Prevention of temporal alopecia following rhytidectomy: the prophylactic use of minoxidil. A study of 60 patients. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(1):66-74(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01066.x
  5. 05
    Kaye KO, Casabona GR, Kästner S, Paprottka FJ. Correction and Prevention of the Pixie Ear Deformity: A Combined Technique. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(2):123-136(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjy095
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Men & Facelift

5 sources

Gender-specific technique modifications and outcome differences.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Rohrich RJ, Stuzin JM, Ramanadham S, Costa C, Dauwe PB. The Modern Male Rhytidectomy: Lessons Learned. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(2):295-307(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003008
  2. 02
    Brissett AE, Hilger PA. Male face-lift. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2005;13(3):451-458(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1016/j.fsc.2005.05.001
  3. 03
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons - Male Cosmetic Surgery Statistics 2024(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  4. 04
    Pascali M, Botti C, Botti G. Face Lifting in Bald Male Patients: New Trends and Specific Needs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):60-69(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006397
  5. 05
    Baker DC, Stefani WA, Chiu ES. Reducing the incidence of hematoma requiring surgical evacuation following male rhytidectomy: a 30-year review of 985 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(7):1973-1985(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-10-15DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000191182.70617.e9
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Cost & Access

3 sources

Pricing surveys, geographic variation studies, and financing data.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons - 2024 Procedural Statistics(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  2. 02
    RealSelf - Facelift Cost Guide 2024(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  3. 03
    Medical Tourism Association - Global Healthcare Costs Report(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Global Institutions

7 sources

ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS statistical reports and professional guidance.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    Mayo Clinic - Facelift: Overview, Risks and Results(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  2. 02
    Cleveland Clinic - Rhytidectomy (Facelift): Procedure Details(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  3. 03
    FDA - Cosmetic Surgery Safety Information and Consumer Updates(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Regierungsquelle)Zugriff: 2026-04-06
  4. 04
    NIH National Library of Medicine - Rhytidectomy StatPearls(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Regierungsquelle)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  5. 05
    Johns Hopkins Medicine - Facelift (Rhytidectomy)(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  6. 06
    World Health Organization - Patient Safety in Surgery(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Regierungsquelle)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
  7. 07
    American Board of Medical Specialties - Board Certification Standards(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-04-01
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Celebrity & Before/After

3 sources

Published analyses of before/after outcomes and public-figure discussion literature.

Referenzen

  1. 01
    American Society of Plastic Surgeons - Celebrity Influence on Cosmetic Procedures(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
  2. 02
    Kinney JR, Kim E, Friedman R, Bustos V, Hassell N, Elmer N, Lee BT, Lin SJ. Which Groups of Plastic Surgery Patients Are Impacted by Social Media Use? An In-Depth Review of Social Media Engagement. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(4):824e-837e(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Fachartikel)Zugriff: 2026-08-05DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010641
  3. 03
    The Aesthetic Society - Aesthetic Plastic Surgery National Databank Statistics 2023(öffnet in neuem Tab)(Organisation)Zugriff: 2026-03-21
Diese Seite zitierenCC-BY 4.0
DEEPPLANE™ Redaktionsteam (2026). Deep Plane Facelift Research: 65 Peer-Reviewed Sources. DEEPPLANE™. Abgerufen von https://deepplane.com/research

Inhalt lizenziert CC-BY 4.0. Kostenlos zur Weitergabe mit Quellenangabe an DEEPPLANE™.

Verwandte Themen

What is Deep Plane Facelift?Best Country for FaceliftRecovery GuideBefore & After ResultsFind a Surgeon
Medizinische Prüfung

DEEPPLANE™ Prüfungsrat

DEEPPLANE™ editorial standard

— A surgeon is named only when one signs— Prüfstatus pro Artikel— Veröffentlichte Standards

The DEEPPLANE™ Review Council is the name under which DEEPPLANE™ publishes its editorial standard; it is not a standing board of named surgeons. Our guides are written and edited in-house to that standard. Review is recorded per article, not claimed for the site as a whole — a guide names a surgeon as its reviewer only when that surgeon has signed it, and says so plainly when none has.

Lernen Sie den Prüfungsrat kennenPrüfprozess →