Preskoči na glavni sadržaj

Deep Plane Facelift Research Library

60 peer-reviewed sources — anatomy, technique, safety, outcomes, and comparisons. 35 citations include a DOI for direct journal access.

Free · No obligation · Replies within 48h

60
Total Citations
39
Journal Articles
35
With DOI
12
Research Areas

Citation Standards

All sources follow MEDRS (Medicine and Science Reliable Source) standards: peer-reviewed journals indexed in PubMed, with systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials weighted above case reports. Institutional statistics from ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS are accepted for prevalence data. Sources are reviewed annually for retraction or supersession.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many peer-reviewed studies support deep plane facelift?

DEEPPLANE™ cites 39 peer-reviewed journal articles and clinical studies on deep plane facelift technique, anatomy, outcomes, and safety — all with PubMed or DOI links for independent verification. Foundational evidence includes the 2012 Jacono & Rousso RCT (same-patient bilateral comparison), a 2020 systematic review confirming greater longevity, and ASPS/ISAPS prevalence data updated annually. (DEEPPLANE™ Research Library, 2026.)

Deep Plane Facelift Research: What the Evidence Actually Shows

The evidence base is strong for longevity — with acknowledged limits in long-term comparative data.

Strongest Clinical Evidence

  • Jacono & Rousso 2012 RCT: same-patient bilateral comparison; most rigorous deep plane vs SMAS study
  • 2020 systematic review: deep plane outlasts MACS and superficial techniques; confirmed across 8 studies
  • 10–15 year longevity consensus: multiple cohort studies; ASPS/ISAPS data updated annually

Where Research Shows Limits

  • Long-term 20+ year data sparse: most follow-up studies end at 5–10 years
  • Technique variation complicates comparisons: surgeon variability in 'deep plane' definition affects outcome data
  • Cost-effectiveness data limited: few studies include economic analysis or quality-of-life outcomes
Anatomical cross-section comparing the SMAS facelift dissection plane with the deeper deep plane facelift dissection plane.

Citations by Research Area

Horizontal timeline of facelift technique evolution from the 1960s subcutaneous facelift through the 1970s SMAS introduction to the modern deep plane facelift.

Deep Plane Technique

9 sources

Foundational and current evidence on deep plane rhytidectomy outcomes and technique.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05
  6. 06
  7. 07
  8. 08
  9. 09

Anatomy & Mechanism

5 sources

Peer-reviewed anatomy studies on SMAS, retaining ligaments, and facial compartments.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Technique Comparisons

5 sources

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews comparing facelift approaches.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Recovery & Outcomes

5 sources

Clinical data on healing timelines, swelling resolution, and patient-reported outcomes.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Safety & Complications

5 sources

Large-cohort safety studies, nerve injury rates, and hematoma incidence data.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Facial Aging Science

5 sources

Volumetric, structural, and gravitational models of facial aging.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Combined Procedures

4 sources

Evidence for simultaneous rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, fat grafting, and neck lifts.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04

Complications Management

5 sources

Nerve palsy, hematoma, scarring, and infection — evidence-based management.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Men & Facelift

4 sources

Gender-specific technique modifications and outcome differences.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04

Cost & Access

3 sources

Pricing surveys, geographic variation studies, and financing data.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03

Global Institutions

7 sources

ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS statistical reports and professional guidance.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05
  6. 06
  7. 07

Celebrity & Before/After

3 sources

Published analyses of before/after outcomes and public-figure discussion literature.

Reference

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
Medicinski pregled

Dr. Yakup Duman

Specijalista plastične, rekonstruktivne i estetske hirurgije

MDSertifikovan od strane odboraSpecijalista plastične hirurgije

Sertifikovani specijalista plastične i estetske hirurgije sa 13+ godina iskustva. Specijalizovan za deep plane fejslifting u bolnici Merkez Prime, Istanbul. Medicinski recenzent za DEEPPLANE™.

Tursko udruženje za plastičnu, rekonstruktivnu i estetsku hirurgiju

Da li vam je ova stranica bila korisna?