Перейти к основному содержанию

Deep Plane Facelift Research Library

60 peer-reviewed sources — anatomy, technique, safety, outcomes, and comparisons. 35 citations include a DOI for direct journal access.

Free · No obligation · Replies within 48h

60
Total Citations
39
Journal Articles
35
With DOI
12
Research Areas

Citation Standards

All sources follow MEDRS (Medicine and Science Reliable Source) standards: peer-reviewed journals indexed in PubMed, with systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials weighted above case reports. Institutional statistics from ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS are accepted for prevalence data. Sources are reviewed annually for retraction or supersession.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many peer-reviewed studies support deep plane facelift?

DEEPPLANE™ cites 39 peer-reviewed journal articles and clinical studies on deep plane facelift technique, anatomy, outcomes, and safety — all with PubMed or DOI links for independent verification. Foundational evidence includes the 2012 Jacono & Rousso RCT (same-patient bilateral comparison), a 2020 systematic review confirming greater longevity, and ASPS/ISAPS prevalence data updated annually. (DEEPPLANE™ Research Library, 2026.)

Deep Plane Facelift Research: What the Evidence Actually Shows

The evidence base is strong for longevity — with acknowledged limits in long-term comparative data.

Strongest Clinical Evidence

  • Jacono & Rousso 2012 RCT: same-patient bilateral comparison; most rigorous deep plane vs SMAS study
  • 2020 systematic review: deep plane outlasts MACS and superficial techniques; confirmed across 8 studies
  • 10–15 year longevity consensus: multiple cohort studies; ASPS/ISAPS data updated annually

Where Research Shows Limits

  • Long-term 20+ year data sparse: most follow-up studies end at 5–10 years
  • Technique variation complicates comparisons: surgeon variability in 'deep plane' definition affects outcome data
  • Cost-effectiveness data limited: few studies include economic analysis or quality-of-life outcomes
Anatomical cross-section comparing the SMAS facelift dissection plane with the deeper deep plane facelift dissection plane.

Citations by Research Area

Horizontal timeline of facelift technique evolution from the 1960s subcutaneous facelift through the 1970s SMAS introduction to the modern deep plane facelift.

Deep Plane Technique

9 sources

Foundational and current evidence on deep plane rhytidectomy outcomes and technique.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05
  6. 06
  7. 07
    National Library of Medicine (NIH) - Rhytidectomy (Facelift) StatPearls(открывается в новой вкладке)(Правительственный источник)Доступ получено: 2026-03-25
  8. 08
  9. 09
    FDA - Cosmetic Surgery Safety Information(открывается в новой вкладке)(Правительственный источник)Доступ получено: 2026-04-06

Anatomy & Mechanism

5 sources

Peer-reviewed anatomy studies on SMAS, retaining ligaments, and facial compartments.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Technique Comparisons

5 sources

Randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews comparing facelift approaches.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Recovery & Outcomes

5 sources

Clinical data on healing timelines, swelling resolution, and patient-reported outcomes.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
    Mayo Clinic - Facelift: What you can expect(открывается в новой вкладке)(Организация)Доступ получено: 2026-04-01
  5. 05

Safety & Complications

5 sources

Large-cohort safety studies, nerve injury rates, and hematoma incidence data.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Facial Aging Science

5 sources

Volumetric, structural, and gravitational models of facial aging.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Combined Procedures

4 sources

Evidence for simultaneous rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, fat grafting, and neck lifts.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04

Complications Management

5 sources

Nerve palsy, hematoma, scarring, and infection — evidence-based management.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04
  5. 05

Men & Facelift

4 sources

Gender-specific technique modifications and outcome differences.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
  4. 04

Cost & Access

3 sources

Pricing surveys, geographic variation studies, and financing data.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
    RealSelf - Facelift Cost Guide 2024(открывается в новой вкладке)(Организация)Доступ получено: 2026-03-21
  3. 03

Global Institutions

7 sources

ASPS, ISAPS, and ABPS statistical reports and professional guidance.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
    FDA - Cosmetic Surgery Safety Information and Consumer Updates(открывается в новой вкладке)(Правительственный источник)Доступ получено: 2026-04-06
  4. 04
    NIH National Library of Medicine - Rhytidectomy StatPearls(открывается в новой вкладке)(Правительственный источник)Доступ получено: 2026-04-01
  5. 05
  6. 06
    World Health Organization - Patient Safety in Surgery(открывается в новой вкладке)(Правительственный источник)Доступ получено: 2026-04-01
  7. 07

Celebrity & Before/After

3 sources

Published analyses of before/after outcomes and public-figure discussion literature.

Ссылки

  1. 01
  2. 02
  3. 03
Медицинская проверка

Dr. Yakup Duman

Специалист по пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии

Доктор медициныСертифицированСпециалист по пластической хирургии

Сертифицированный специалист по пластической и эстетической хирургии с более чем 13-летним опытом. Специализируется на подтяжке лица deep plane в Merkez Prime Hospital, Стамбул. Медицинский рецензент DEEPPLANE™.

Турецкая ассоциация пластической, реконструктивной и эстетической хирургии

Была ли эта страница полезной?